If there was any kind of a bombshell in the last big UFO/UAP hearings, it was the claim that the US military does have clear images it is not sharing with the public. While this is understandable given the fact that it would likely give away some technical abilities, it leaves many questions.
UFO Hearing Overview:
– The U.S. House Oversight Committee held a hearing on November 13, 2024, to discuss “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena” (UAPs), commonly referred to as UFOs.
– The hearing aimed to increase transparency about UAP research programs and findings by the U.S. government.
Key Testimonies:
– Retired Navy Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet: He shared an email about near-midair collisions with UAPs and mentioned a disinformation strategy within the government to undermine UAP reports.
– Luis Elizondo: A former Pentagon intelligence officer, Elizondo emphasized the need for accountability and criticized the intelligence community’s secrecy surrounding UAPs. He noted that many sightings occur near military installations and warned of potential national security implications.
– Michael Shellenberger: Shellenberger testified about a secret Pentagon program called “Immaculate Constellation,” which documents UAP sightings. He alleged that the government possesses high-quality visual data on UAPs, which has not been disclosed to the public.
Government Response:
– The hearings highlighted ongoing efforts by Congress to push for more transparency regarding UAP research and findings. The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) has been involved in investigating UAPs, but there are concerns about secrecy and lack of disclosure.
Possible Scenarios Explaining the Facts
1. National Security Concerns:
Scenario: The government is aware of UAPs being advanced technology from foreign adversaries or non-state actors, posing a significant national security threat. The secrecy is to prevent revealing vulnerabilities or capabilities to potential enemies.
Evidence: Elizondo’s warnings about national security implications and Shellenberger’s mention of high-quality data suggest the government might be concerned about the origins and capabilities of UAPs.
2. Technological Advancements:
Scenario: UAPs are advanced drones or surveillance technology developed by the U.S. or other countries. The secrecy is to protect intellectual property and strategic advantages.
Evidence: The presence of UAPs near military installations could indicate testing or deployment of new technologies. Shellenberger’s testimony about high-quality data might imply that these are sophisticated systems.
3. Disinformation Campaigns:
Scenario: The government is engaged in disinformation campaigns to confuse public perception of UAPs, either to hide their true nature or to create a diversion from other issues.
Evidence: Gallaudet’s mention of a disinformation strategy and the lack of transparency from government agencies support this scenario.
4. Extraterrestrial Origin:
Scenario: UAPs are of extraterrestrial origin, and the government is keeping this secret to avoid public panic or to study the phenomenon without interference.
Evidence: While there is no concrete evidence supporting this scenario, the persistent secrecy and lack of explanation for UAP sightings have fueled speculation about extraterrestrial origins.
5. Bureaucratic Secrecy:
Scenario: The secrecy surrounding UAPs is due to bureaucratic inertia and the desire to maintain control over sensitive information, rather than any specific threat or technology.
Evidence: The lack of transparency and accountability within government agencies, as highlighted by Elizondo and Shellenberger, suggests that bureaucratic factors might play a role in the secrecy.
These scenarios are speculative and based on the information provided during the hearings. The true nature and reasons behind the government’s handling of UAPs remain unclear without further disclosure.