A potential California superstorm could become the costliest disaster in U.S. history, far surpassing previous estimates and recent catastrophic events. Here’s an updated overview of the potential impacts and latest relevant information:
Projected Costs and Damages
The estimated total cost of a California superstorm has risen dramatically:
- Original projections put the cost at nearly $1 trillion, with $627 billion in lost production of goods and services over five years.
- More recent estimates suggest the disaster could cost up to $1.69 trillion, making it a true “trillion-dollar mega disaster”.
This far exceeds the costs of other major U.S. disasters:
- The 2001 World Trade Center attacks and Hurricane Katrina each caused about $100 billion in business interruption.
- The costliest year for billion-dollar weather disasters was 2017, with $355.6 billion in damages.
Potential Impacts
An ARkStorm (Atmospheric River 1,000-year storm) scenario could lead to:
- Flooding of thousands of square miles to depths of 10-20 feet.
- Hurricane-force winds up to 125 mph in some areas.
- Hundreds of landslides damaging infrastructure.
- Disruption of power, water, and sewage systems for weeks or months.
- Evacuation of 1.5 million people.
- Potential deaths of 1% of California’s population (about 395,000 people) based on historical patterns.
Climate Change Considerations
Climate scientists warn that global warming is increasing the likelihood and intensity of such extreme weather events:
- Rising sea levels and warmer oceans can lead to higher storm surges and more destructive coastal flooding.
- Changes in atmospheric patterns may result in more frequent and intense “atmospheric river” events.
Recent Developments
- In 2023, the U.S. experienced a record 28 billion-dollar weather and climate disasters, totaling $92.9 billion in damages.
- California has already seen increased instances of severe flooding, with recent storms in 2023 causing significant damage.
Preparedness and Mitigation
To minimize long-term impacts, experts recommend:
- Creating comprehensive emergency plans.
- Increasing inventories of critical materials.
- Backing up information systems.
- Diversifying supply chains and transportation routes.
- Investing in flood protection infrastructure, with California seeking an additional $202 million for such measures.
As climate change continues to alter weather patterns, understanding and preparing for extreme events like a potential California superstorm becomes increasingly critical for long-term resilience and survival.
Read More
[1] https://phys.org/news/2011-03-usc-california-superstorm-costliest-disaster.html
[2] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-01-10/california-storm-costs-could-add-up-to-nations-first-billion-dollar-disaster-of-2023
[3] https://abcnews.go.com/US/californias-trillion-dollar-mega-disaster-talking/story?id=74490509
[4] https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2023-historic-year-us-billion-dollar-weather-and-climate-disasters
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_California_floods
[6] https://www.aonedge.com/Resource-Center/Blog/California-Great-Flood-of-1862
[7] https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2024/01/clusters-atmospheric-rivers-costlier-expected
[8] https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/10/us/california-storm-damage.html
1 comment
The USGS study, and the dollar estimate of damages, assumes that CA’s nuclear facilities are undamaged in any way. The report says on its face, p 42, that they were explicitly left out of consideration for the scenario. To their credit, they do call for further research on the matte provided congress gives them the funds. If they don’t then that will be a lot like the folks in Japan who ignored the seismologist’s 2009 warning that they should study tsunami hazards at the Fukushima plant. If I were in congress that’s not a legacy I would want to risk