Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?

Experiential memory, or the subjective experience of recalling past events, is primarily a function of the brain, involving complex interactions between multiple neural systems. While external storage methods like books, photographs, or digital databases can preserve information, the act of remembering as a conscious experience is a neurocognitive process rooted in specific brain regions. The hippocampus plays a crucial role in forming and consolidating episodic memories, while the prefrontal cortex is involved in organizing and retrieving them. The amygdala contributes to the emotional aspects of memories, and various cortical regions store different sensory details or semantic information. Memories are not static recordings; they are reconstructed each time they are recalled, allowing for associations between different memories and integration of new information with existing knowledge. Emotional and contextual factors also influence how memories are formed and retrieved. Thus, while external methods can supplement human memory, the unique experience of remembering—encompassing emotions, sensations, and self-awareness—is fundamentally a product of neural processes within the brain.

Based on current scientific evidence, memories are stored in the brain. Decades of neuroscience research have provided strong evidence.

Localization of Memory Storage

Specific brain regions have been identified as crucial for different types of memory formation and storage:

– The hippocampus is essential for forming new episodic memories (memories of specific events)[1][4]. Damage to the hippocampus, as in the famous case of patient H.M., results in the inability to form new long-term memories.

– The neocortex is involved in storing long-term memories, especially semantic memories (general knowledge)[1][4].

– The amygdala plays a key role in emotional memories[4].

– The basal ganglia and cerebellum are important for implicit memories like motor skills[4].

Cellular and Molecular Basis of Memory

Cellular memory is the hypothesis that such things as memories, habits, interests, and tastes may somehow be stored in all the cells of human bodies, not only in the brain.The suggestion is based largely around anecdotal evidence of organ transplants after which the recipient was reported to have developed new habits or memories.^[1] – wiki

Scientists have made significant progress in understanding how memories are encoded at the cellular level:

– Place cells in the hippocampus fire when an animal is in a specific location, forming a cognitive map of the environment[5].

– Long-term potentiation (LTP), a strengthening of synaptic connections between neurons, is believed to be a key mechanism for memory formation.

– Studies have identified specific proteins and genes involved in memory consolidation and storage.

 

Memory Manipulation

Recent research has demonstrated that memories can be artificially manipulated within the brain:

– False memories have been implanted into the brains of sleeping mice, showing that memories can be created and stored in specific neural circuits[5].

– Optogenetic techniques have allowed researchers to activate or suppress specific memories by manipulating targeted neurons.

Distributed Memory Storage

While memories are not stored in a single discrete location like files on a hard drive, they are distributed across networks of neurons in the brain[1][2]. The prefrontal cortex plays a crucial role in working memory and coordinating the recall of distributed memory traces[3].

There is still much to learn about the precise mechanisms of memory storage and recall. The scientific evidence strongly supports that memories are physically encoded and stored within the brain’s neural networks, rather than existing as external signals that the brain simply “tunes into.”

It seems pretty clear that memory storage is in the brain, but there is also the idea that memories can be stored in other organs. Is there any evidence for this?

While immune memory and gut-related “memories” are distinct from experienced cognitive memories, there are some interesting connections that can lead to conflation:

Immune System Memory

Immunological memory allows the body to respond more quickly and effectively to pathogens it has encountered before:

– This is not a conscious memory, but rather a biological adaptation of immune cells.
– However, the faster immune response upon re-exposure can sometimes be felt physically (e.g. milder symptoms), potentially creating a sense of “remembering” the illness.

Gut-Related “Memories”

The gut microbiome can develop a form of “ecological memory” in response to dietary exposures:

– This can influence future responses to certain foods or nutrients.
– While not conscious memories, these gut adaptations can affect how we feel after eating certain foods, potentially being interpreted as “remembering” past dietary experiences.

Conflation with Experienced Memories

There are a few reasons why these biological processes might be conflated with cognitive memories:

1. Physical sensations: The body’s learned responses (immune or gut-related) can produce physical sensations that may trigger cognitive memories of past experiences.

2. Intuitive responses: Gut feelings or intuitions about certain foods or environments may be influenced by these biological “memories,” leading people to believe they consciously remember past events.

3. Nocebo effect: Expectations about negative outcomes based on past experiences can sometimes manifest as physical symptoms, reinforcing the idea of “body memory.”

Organ Donor Dreams

The phenomenon of organ recipients dreaming about their donors or having new memories is not scientifically proven, but there are some theories:

– Cellular memory: Some propose that memories or personality traits can be stored in cells throughout the body, but this is not supported by mainstream science.

– Psychological factors: The emotional impact of receiving an organ transplant may influence dreams and thought patterns.

– Medication effects: Some immunosuppressant drugs can affect sleep patterns and dreams.

– Coincidence and confirmation bias: Given the large number of transplant recipients, some coincidences are likely to occur and be overreported.

It’s important to note that while the immune system and gut microbiome do have forms of “memory,” these are distinct from cognitive memories and experiences. The conflation of these biological processes with experienced memories is likely due to a combination of physical sensations, psychological factors, and misinterpretation of bodily responses.

Tension With Spiritual Traditions

Spiritual traditions often developed as pre-scientific attempts to explain natural phenomena and human experiences before the advent of modern scientific methods. Here’s how this relates to the topic of memory and consciousness:

1. Pre-scientific explanations: Many spiritual traditions developed explanations for memory, consciousness, and human experiences that went beyond the physical brain. These included concepts like:

– Soul or spirit as the seat of consciousness
– Reincarnation and past-life memories
– Collective consciousness or ancestral memory
– Divine or supernatural sources of knowledge and memory

2. Limited understanding of the brain: Without modern neuroscience, ancient cultures lacked detailed knowledge of brain function. This gap was often filled with spiritual or metaphysical explanations.

3. Holistic view of human experience: Many traditions viewed humans as more than just physical beings, incorporating ideas of spirit, energy, or non-physical aspects of consciousness.

4. Intuitive experiences: Phenomena like déjà vu, intuition, or seemingly unexplainable knowledge were often attributed to spiritual sources rather than brain functions.

5. Cultural transmission: These spiritual explanations became deeply ingrained in cultures, passed down through generations as part of religious or philosophical traditions.

6. Persistence of beliefs: Even as scientific understanding has advanced, these spiritual explanations continue to resonate with many people due to their cultural significance and ability to provide meaning.

7. Reconciliation attempts: Some modern thinkers try to integrate scientific findings with spiritual beliefs, reinterpreting traditional ideas in light of new knowledge.

While science now provides evidence-based explanations for memory and consciousness rooted in brain function, spiritual traditions continue to offer alternative perspectives that some find meaningful or complementary to scientific understanding. This tension between scientific and spiritual explanations reflects the ongoing process of human knowledge evolving over time.

How Simulation Theory Can Make Aspects of Spirituality True

If we are living in a simulation, then our science would only detect what the simulation wants it to detect. There could be experiences beyond science in that way.

1. Controlled environment: In a simulated reality, the “laws of physics” and observable phenomena would be defined by the simulation’s parameters. This means that scientific discoveries would be limited to what the simulation allows or is programmed to reveal.

2. Limitations of in-simulation science: Our scientific methods and instruments would be part of the simulation, potentially incapable of detecting anything outside its scope. This creates a fundamental limitation on what we can know or prove within the simulation.

3. Malleable reality: The simulation could theoretically alter any aspect of reality, including memories, physical laws, or even the continuity of consciousness, without the inhabitants being aware of the changes.

4. Reincarnation and memory transfer: In this context, the concept of transferring memories between “sims” or into new incarnations becomes plausible within the rules of the simulation, regardless of our current scientific understanding.

5. Questioning empirical evidence: This perspective challenges the reliability of empirical evidence, as all observations could be manipulated or limited by the simulation’s design.

6. Unfalsifiability: The simulation hypothesis, when taken to this extent, becomes unfalsifiable – any evidence for or against it could be seen as part of the simulation’s design.

7. Philosophical implications: This view raises profound questions about the nature of reality, free will, and the reliability of our perceptions and scientific knowledge.

This interpretation of simulation theory offers a framework that could accommodate various spiritual or paranormal concepts. At this time, it remains a philosophical hypothesis. It doesn’t provide verifiable evidence for phenomena like memory transfer or reincarnation. In practice, for having practical effects in this simulation frame, our best approach to understanding the world remains the scientific method, even if we acknowledge its potential limitations in a simulated reality scenario.

Direct Experience Counter to Base Reality

Many people, this author included, have had experiences that are so scientifically improbable that they seem to provide evidence for a plastic reality. After years of searching for other common sense explanations, we may be left still wondering. In a sense, this is only a new way of expressing a faith that the universe is more mysterious than we generally recognize. Does memory exist outside of the brain? Perhaps in another shell of reality, a reality where time is different than we know it, perhaps in a base reality that is creating our own, it does.

 

Read More
^{[1] https://news.mit.edu/2017/neuroscientists-identify-brain-circuit-necessary-memory-formation-0406
[2] https://aeon.co/essays/how-memories-persist-where-bodies-and-even-brains-do-not
[3] https://news.weill.cornell.edu/news/2022/07/new-study-reveals-where-memory-fragments-are-stored
[4] https://qbi.uq.edu.au/brain-basics/memory/where-are-memories-stored
[5] https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/q2ik7t/is_there_evidence_that_our_brains_are_physically/
[6] https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/researchers-uncover-how-human-brain-separates-stores-retrieves-memories
[7] https://evolutionnews.org/2024/02/memories-are-not-stored-in-brain-heres-why/
[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QSZ_gK4gkU
[9] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060830204206.htm
[10] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070419140914.htm
[11] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070719093320.htm
[12] http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/UCLA-Researchers-Discover-Key-to-7869
[13] http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/scienceshow/memory-storage-in-the-brain/3181390
[14] http://www.viewzone.com/memorycells.html
[15] http://stke.sciencemag.org/about/help/cm
[16] https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiomes/articles/10.3389/frmbi.2024.1363961/full
[17] https://www.rockefeller.edu/news/31495-how-foodborne-diseases-protect-the-guts-nervous-system/
[18] https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/beyond-brain-gut-microbiome-and-alzheimers-disease
[19] https://medicine.wustl.edu/news/gut-bacteria-affect-brain-health-mouse-study-shows/
[20] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8001875/
[21] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-021-01309-7
[22] https://asm.org/articles/2023/may/understanding-immunological-memory
[23] https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/the-brain-gut-connection
[24] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-science/
[25] https://www.nationalacademies.org/evolution/science-and-religion
[26] https://risingentropy.com/the-spiritual-and-the-scientific/
[27] https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/08/26/on-the-intersection-of-science-and-religion/
[28] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSy-GDfHhzg
[29] https://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2017/08/22/the-science-of-spirituality-a-psychologist-and-a-neuroscientist-explain-being-in-the-flow/
[30] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4348483/
[31] https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/memory-and-invention-traditions}