Earth’s Inner Core Composition: From Myth to Modern Science

For centuries, the composition and properties of Earth’s inner core have remained elusive. While iron is the primary component, recent research suggests the core also contains significant amounts of carbon—around 3.8% by mass—which plays a crucial role in its formation. Carbon accelerates the crystallization process of the inner core, making it possible for the solid core to form at temperatures roughly 5,000 Kelvin (4,727°C), far less intense supercooling than predicted for pure iron.

This finding helps explain seismic observations showing the core is less dense than iron alone and clarifies why the inner core solidified without the need for nucleation seeds, unlike water forming hail. Besides iron and carbon, the core may also contain small amounts of oxygen and silicon, which influence its properties but slow down freezing compared to carbon’s accelerating effect.

Understanding the exact makeup of the inner core is vital because it generates Earth’s magnetic field, which protects the planet from harmful solar radiation and powers geologic processes like plate tectonics. As the core cools and solidifies, it releases heat driving convection currents in the mantle, reshaping Earth’s surface over millions of years.

Though direct sampling of the core is impossible, advanced computer simulations combined with seismic data are providing new insights into this hidden, dynamic heart of our planet, reshaping our understanding of Earth’s evolution and the forces that sustain life.

A Historical Journey: Evolving Beliefs About Earth’s Center

Humanity’s understanding of what lies at Earth’s center has transformed dramatically over millennia, blending myth, fiction, and science. In ancient times, civilizations like the Greeks envisioned the Earth’s interior as a mythical underworld, such as Hades, a realm of the dead rather than a physical core. Pythagoras around 530 BC was among the first to propose Earth as a sphere, but ideas of its interior remained speculative, often tied to religious or philosophical concepts.

By the medieval and Renaissance periods, Christian theology influenced views, with some depicting the center as the location of hell—a fiery abyss. Maps from 1668, for instance, illustrated intricate interpretations of the planet’s inner workings, including vast caverns and passages. In the 17th and 18th centuries, scientific thinkers like Isaac Newton began applying physics, suggesting a denser center based on gravitational principles, though still without direct evidence.

The 19th century marked a pivotal shift with the rise of geology and fiction’s role in popularizing ideas. Jules Verne’s 1864 novel Journey to the Center of the Earth captivated audiences by imagining a hollow Earth accessible via volcanic conduits, filled with prehistoric oceans, dinosaurs, and vast caverns. Verne drew from contemporary geological theories, such as the belief that volcanic craters connected to deep magma chambers, and hollow Earth hypotheses bandied about in Europe at the time. While fictional, it reflected and influenced public perceptions, contrasting with emerging scientific skepticism of such caverns.

Scientific breakthroughs accelerated in the 20th century. In 1906, British geologist Richard Oldham used earthquake waves (seismology) to discover the Earth’s core, identifying it as a distinct layer where seismic waves slow down. Then, in 1936, Danish seismologist Inge Lehmann refined this by proposing a solid inner core surrounded by a liquid outer core, explaining discrepancies in seismic data. By the mid-20th century, meteorite studies suggested the core was primarily an iron-nickel alloy, accounting for its density and magnetic properties.

Post-World War II advancements, including high-pressure experiments and computer simulations, dismissed Verne’s hollow Earth entirely by the 1950s, confirming a solid, hot interior inaccessible to humans. In recent decades, neutrino detectors, advanced seismology, and lab recreations of core conditions have revealed more complexities, such as the inner core’s super-rotation and anisotropic structure.

Mysterious Chemistry: The Modern View

Traditionally, we have two ways to figure out what the core is made of: meteorites and seismology. By examining the chemistry of meteorites — which are thought to be pieces of planets that never formed, or pieces of the cores of destroyed Earth-like planets — we can get an idea of what our core could be made of.

Recent 2025 research, however, has upended some assumptions. Atomic-scale simulations show that carbon plays a pivotal role, comprising up to 3.8% of the core’s composition, enabling the molten core to freeze into a solid inner core millions of years ago and stabilizing the magnetic field. This resolves the “nucleation paradox,” where pure iron would require unrealistic supercooling to solidify. Elements like oxygen and silicon may also be present, aiding crystallization, while silicon and sulfur unexpectedly slow freezing. These findings, published in Nature Communications, indicate a more carbon-rich core than previously thought, altering our models of Earth’s thermal evolution.

As we continue probing with advanced tools, from seismic networks to quantum simulations, the core’s secrets—once the domain of imagination—are yielding to science, revealing a dynamic heart that has shaped our world.

Read More

[1] https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/we-are-just-beginning-to-discover-what-earths-inner-core-is-really-made-of