A recent report revealed that fish caught near Fukushima, Japan, exhibited radiation levels over 2,500 times the legal limit. This alarming finding comes as Japan’s fisheries ministry continues to test marine life in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, which occurred in March 2011. The incident released significant amounts of radioactive materials, including cesium isotopes, into the ocean, affecting local fish populations. While the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has stated that overall radiation levels in treated water are below safety limits, concerns persist regarding the long-term impact on marine life and human consumption of contaminated fish[1][3][5]. The findings underscore ongoing public health and environmental challenges stemming from the disaster, as well as the geopolitical tensions surrounding Japan’s handling of radioactive discharges into the Pacific Ocean[3].

Radiation Levels in Fish Have Improved

The radiation levels in fish today compared to those immediately following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011 show a significant decrease. Initially, fish caught near the Fukushima area exhibited alarmingly high levels of radioactive cesium, with some samples exceeding legal limits by thousands of times. For instance, studies conducted shortly after the disaster indicated that bluefin tuna off the U.S. West Coast contained measurable amounts of cesium isotopes, reflecting contamination from the Fukushima waters.

As of recent reports, almost no foodstuffs in Japan are still contaminated, and monitoring has shown that radiation levels in fish have dramatically declined. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has confirmed that current radiation levels in treated water discharged from Fukushima are well below safety limits, indicating a negligible impact on marine life and human health. While a very small number of fish samples still show trace amounts of radioactivity, these levels are significantly lower than those observed in the immediate aftermath of the disaster. Overall, ongoing assessments indicate that fish today generally exhibit much lower levels of contamination compared to 2011, reflecting successful decontamination efforts and improved monitoring practices.

Yet Concerns Remain

A few times every year I think about Fukushima and how it is still leaking radiation. On the California coast I have experienced strange allergies to the fog that rolls in from the sea. I started to wonder if any of my various symptoms might be due to stealthy tritium (hydrogen-3), a rare and radioactive isotope of hydrogen which is very difficult to detect with an ordinary Geiger counter.

Cesium-134 and Tritium: The Ongoing Legacy of Fukushima

Cesium-134

Cesium-134, often referred to as the “fingerprint” of the Fukushima disaster, is a radioactive isotope that does not occur naturally in the environment and has a relatively short half-life of approximately two years. This means that any detectable levels of cesium-134 must originate from recent releases, specifically from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in March 2011. The half-life of a radioactive isotope indicates the time required for half of its radioactivity to decay; thus, cesium-134 serves as a crucial marker for tracing contamination from Fukushima. Notably, cesium-134 was detected 100 miles due west of Eureka, California, as recently as November 2014, confirming the trans-Pacific currents’ transport of radioactive materials to U.S. shores, although the detected levels were significantly below U.S. drinking water safety standards.

The Current Situation at Fukushima

Despite these findings, the situation surrounding the Fukushima crisis remains critical. Currently, millions of tons of contaminated water are stored on-site in over 900 tanks. This water has been used to cool the reactors and spent fuel rods to prevent further radioactive releases and is also a result of groundwater seeping into the reactor basements. Efforts to mitigate leakage through methods such as “ice walls” (artificial permafrost barriers) and advanced processing technologies have proven inadequate. Late last year, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) acknowledged that several long-lived isotopes, including strontium-90—known for its potential to mimic calcium in biological systems—were present in concentrations over 100 times the legal limits.

The release of contaminated water into the ocean remains a contentious plan. Strontium-90 has a half-life of 28.8 years and poses significant health risks due to its accumulation in bones if ingested by marine life or humans. Concerns are heightened by studies indicating that fish migrating across vast distances could carry these isotopes throughout the Pacific Ocean, potentially impacting food safety and marine ecosystems.

Current Discharge Practices:

The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has been discharging treated water from the Fukushima site since August 2023. This water is processed to remove most radionuclides except for tritium, which is more challenging to eliminate. The discharged water is diluted with seawater before being released into the ocean.

Tritium: A Unique Challenge

In addition to cesium-134 and strontium-90, tritium—a radioactive isotope of hydrogen—presents unique challenges regarding health effects in the aftermath of Fukushima. Tritium is primarily released into the environment through nuclear power operations and accidents. It exists in two forms: tritiated water (HTO) and organically bound tritium (OBT). HTO is rapidly absorbed and distributed throughout the body with a biological half-life of about 10 days, while OBT can remain in the body for much longer—up to one year or more—making it more concerning for long-term exposure risks.

Health Risks Associated with Tritium Exposure

The health effects of tritium exposure have been extensively studied, although direct evidence from human populations remains limited. Laboratory studies indicate that high doses of tritium can cause genetic damage and increase cancer risk in animals; however, these doses are significantly higher than those typically encountered by the public. Epidemiological studies suggest that environmental levels of tritium exposure result in negligible health risks. For instance, doses from tritium released from nuclear facilities are often below 0.1 mSv/year, which is minimal compared to natural background radiation levels.

While there is no conclusive evidence linking low-level tritium exposure to cancer in humans, certain potential health effects have been identified:

• Cancer: Although animal studies have shown potential carcinogenic effects at high doses, low-level exposure does not appear to pose significant risks.
• Genetic Effects: High doses can lead to genetic mutations and reproductive issues in animals; however, these effects are not observed at typical environmental exposure levels.
• Developmental Abnormalities: Concerns exist regarding in utero exposures to tritium at high doses; however, such exposures are unlikely at current environmental levels.

Conclusion

In summary, while cesium-134 serves as a critical indicator of recent contamination from Fukushima and ongoing releases raise significant concerns about marine life and food safety, tritium presents a different set of challenges regarding long-term health effects. The prevailing scientific consensus indicates that while both isotopes pose risks, particularly at elevated levels, typical environmental exposure levels are unlikely to result in significant adverse health effects for the public. Continuous monitoring and research are essential to fully understand the implications of these radioactive materials on human health and the environment as we navigate the ongoing legacy of the Fukushima disaster.

Read More
[1] https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/west-coast/science-data/fukushima-radiation-us-west-coast-tuna
[2] https://www.wasserstoff-unsere-zukunft.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Erneuerbare_Energie/EU_SET_Technology_Map_2011.pdf
[3] https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2024/01/radioactive-fish-and-geopolitics-economic-coercion-and-china-japan-relations/
[4] https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/status-update
[5] https://www.bfs.de/EN/topics/ion/accident-management/emergency/fukushima/environmental-consequences.html
[6] https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/appendices/fukushima-radiation-exposure

[7] https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/multimedia/videos/iaea-reports-on-fukushima-daiichi-alps-treated-water-release
[8] https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-daiichi-accident