This was a popular post that I’m bringing back for the entertainment and educational value. This article below brings up a very interesting situation. What do you do if your gut tells you a news story can’t be true, but the story cites experts and you aren’t an expert, plus the story is on an official news web site, in this case, news.au. Here’s the story:
MOST of us believe winning lotto is down to the luck of the draw. But a syndicate of university professors and tutors in Britain thought it could also be related to the principles of mathematical probability….
A syndicate of mathematics professors in Britain develop a formula for picking lotto numbers. .. they win $13 million. … The syndicate then set up a computer program to check the numbers every week. It took four years and a total outlay of $8700, but on Saturday, the formula succeeded. Matching the winning numbers and the bonus ball, they hit the jackpot. .. The syndicate, made up of 17 staff members at Bradford University and College, bagged the big prize by using two boxes, 49 pieces of paper and a large amount of brainpower. (News.au)
Here is the method they used:
Instead of each member randomly choosing numbers or relying on birthdays and significant dates as they had done this time they came up with an unbeatable formulae. All 49 numbers were written on pieces of paper and placed in one box. Each syndicate member in turn then picked out six numbers, until eight lines were filled, using 48 of the 49 numbers. The remaining number was then used to start a new line by the next syndicate member, who picked from a second box where the pieces of paper already drawn had been placed. As a result each number appeared at least twice in the syndicate’s 17 lines, with four numbers appearing three times.
( mailonsunday)
The article is misleading. The formula / method they used did not increase their odds. There is always a 1 in 13.98 million chance of winning. You can’t increase those odds because the motion of the balls in the machine is random.
As one commenter put it:
This is a simple system that anyone could have used. It has no more to do with any ‘mathematical formula’ than sticking your finger up your nose.
Here is the real scoop on lottery math:
In a typical 6/49 game, six numbers are drawn from a range of 49 and if the six numbers on a ticket match the numbers drawn, the ticket holder is a jackpot winner–this is true no matter the order in which the numbers appear. The probability of this happening is 1 in 14 million (13,983,816 to be exact).
Don’t email Dr. Jordan or myself because you think one of us knows a secret formula for increasing your chances of winning the lottery.
It is the year 2019 and no one has won again with this formula, despite it being described on several sites. As you can see from the comments in this post, it’s not for lack of interest. If it worked, it would have worked again by now again. My view is that the group won by luck alone, not due to the formula.
Yes, it is true that a math formula won, but not because of the formula, just because they got lucky, like any other player might.
274 comments
Good for them. But can they win consistently? That is the question. If they won only once, then it is pure luck. If they can win consistently, then it is very interesting.
I have developed a method in 1991. And it only took me one week, not four years. And I am not a mathematics professor, but I hold in PhD in medical science from a respectable university in USA.
What I can do is trap the jackpot in one third of all possible combinations. I also trap hundreds of thousands of secondary prizes, and not only the jackpot. For example, in the Canadian 6/49 lottery a week ago, I trapped the jackpot and 360,000 secondary prizes in 5 million out of the possible 14 Million combinations. This means that I have almost TRIPLED the chance of winning.
And there is not magic formula. Simple mathematics is all I use. And I have an 80% success rate tested over a period of 17 years.
So people would ask: why then have I not won a big prize? Because I only buy a few tickets. If I had a syndicate of say a 10,000 people we buy each $20 worth, I have no doubt we would have won substantial amounts of money.
I would be glad to show those professors what I can do. I will also welcome any willing syndicate to use my numbers.
If there is a professional and capable marketing/public relations company willing to cooperate with me in a lucrative business ventures, I am willing to travel around the world and give one week courses to willing individuals on how to do it. It will create a sensational revolution in the lottery business when my methods become public. Lottery will not be the same !
Dr. Jordan.
Hi Dr Jordan,
finaly one person who is speaking about proper things related to lotto numbers. I like your explanation very much since it is in total congruence with Dr Jung’s syncronicity experience! People talking about probability by lotto,simply DO NOT understand SYNCRONICITY /RANDOMNESS/ EVENT at all!
What makes me confused is mathematical method you are using, which means, probability calculation, isn’t it!? Sorry, but at this point your “system” sounds controversal to me!
Your system should be OUT OF MATHS since maths is UNABLE TO ACHIVE SYNCRONICITY / RANDOMNESS/!? Am I wrong?
I do play once a week on regular basis approx. 50 combinations per draw.
My serious proposal to you Dr Jordan:
Let’s try your system prove and start IMMEDIATELY playing 100 combinations per draw for 2 months and see if we get respectful winning amounts!Fair play?
Alex
Dr. Jordan,
I was wondering if by any chance i can see your method of getting the results for the lottery. my email is victoria.pullman@coramhc.com
Mr. Dr jordan i have studying the pick 3 lotto in the U.S. for S.C. and seen were they use days and years + odd and even nunbers in patterns, have you seen such
Dr Jordan,
I was wondering if you could give me a number to try my luck at India Super Lotto .
It follows 6/49 pattern.
Thanks,
Gaurav
Dr Jordan,
I was wondering if you could give me a number to try my luck at India Super Lotto .
It follows 6/49 pattern.
My email id is gaurav21singh@gmail.com
Thanks,
Gaurav
Dear Dr. Jordan,
I am truely amazed and very delighted on your spectacular discovery on how to win lotto using your own derived mathematical method. I have played the mega millions/california super lotto,daily 3,4 and 5 for years but no winnings yet, I have always had the conviction that I will win the jackpot.
I am absolutely convince now that I coincidentaly bumped into your site that you are the GOD`s sent. Please help me out.
Thanks in anticipation,
Ereola
Ereola J. Ogundairo, you are an idiot. Dr. Jordan is also an idiot. There is no way of increasing probability in a randomly generated lottery system. Don’t be fooled and everyone please stop wasting your time, go get jobs, and vote Republican.
I have been playing for couple years now with hours put in of time almost daily of research on pattern and groups past presents draws etc. and there is no formula at all! it all comes down to how much efforts you welling to put in reading pattern of numbers and understand numbers and see numbers as positions , that’s my approach! I often buy few tickets a week so far I did won more than the average player! I managed to repeatedly predict the first (positions) numbers correctly , some times the back last few positions in couple case in lotto max draws in the 3 row numbers on two occasions I have the correct 7 numbers scattered in 3 sets of numbers generated based on my first row pick, also if you been tracking all the three big lotto draws you will notice similarity in numbers patterns of similarity that has happened at least once a month an influence!!!
Are you still giving out lottery numbers for the Canadian Lotto 6/49 for free?
“I hold in PhD in medical science from a respectable university in USA.”
My advice: Let it out. Don’t hold that PhD in, you’ll hurt yourself. 😉
Good luck with your scam, I mean plan. Unfortunately, as the country goes deeper and deeper in debt, more people will be vulnerable to “money for nothing” schemes like this.
People, if you need money, start working on a career that will provide needed goods or services.
Some hints: Even in a depression, people will need food and water, heating and cooling, shelter, clothes, transportation medical care and ways to communicate.
Computers are not a luxury item, they’ve become extensions of ourselves, prosthetic brains, in a way. The economy will get worse before it gets better, so, cheap computers that consume low amounts of power will be increasingly popular. See the One Laptop Per Child project, for example.
Why is everyone so [screw]ing stupid?
Lack of education?
I am shocked at your language.
There is no scam. If you read what I said carefully, I mentioned that I am willing to PROVE to any groups free of charge that I can do what I claim to be able to do.
So rather than read carefully, you started an attack.
I mention my PhD qualification in order to give credibility to the subject, since I am a scientist and not a crackpot.
Please don’t lecture me on the economy !
I thought I was writing to a decent medium, but obviously I was wrong.
You need to grow up !
Dr Jordan,
I am a strong believer of the capability of mathematics to reveal anything, infact ive been myself trying to figure out the winning numbers of the china state lottery.
its a 6+1 lottery in which we’ve to pick 6 numbers between 1-33, and 1 number between 1-16.
Of course with a 33,6 game u have a possibility of 1107568 combinations.
Any idea we can figure this out Mate and we can work together to winning n sharing it:)
Please write on my private email to talk ab t this further.Here’s a link to the last 200 winning numbers.
(link removed, possible virus.)
G
No formula or method can change the odds of any truly random game of chance. The motion of the balls in a lottery sphere is random.
But here is my real point: Take a look at the 30 fastest growing occupations from the US labor market statistics: http://www.bls.gov/. Lottery winners did not make the list this year. Most people have to work hard to put food on their families. 😉
Thank you for a more decent response. So I will give you a detailed answer.
Yes indeed the lottery outcome is random. That is why it is predictable, because of its randomness. I know this is hard to understand, but why argue about it when I have the solid proof to back up every word I said. I will give you an example. The Canadian 6/49 has 13.9 Million possibilities. Just a few days ago I created a list of 4 million combinations, which is less than one third. The jackpot and 250,000 other secondary prizes were trapped there in my list. At least 20 million tickets were sold for that draw across Canada, and no one trapped the jackpot. There were only about 220,000 winners of the smaller prizes. So using less than one third of the total possible combinations, I trapped the jackpot plus I also trapped more prizes than all people across Canada buying unguided from the total pool of 13.9 Million combinations.
This feat was not achieved only once. It was achieved consistently since 1992 until today with 80% success rate. Sixteen years of no failure !
I assure you, such results are not an accident. Most people think that because a process is random then the outcome is not predictable. That is so untrue. If you throw two dice many times, the process is random. But you will notice that you can predict the frequency of the total being “7” from both dice. The only reason you can make such a prediction is BECAUSE of the randomness. When a water drop falls on a pool of water, the ripple effect is in the shape of concentric circles, and the reason for that is the random Brownian movement of the molecules. That is why you don’t see pyramids or squares or triangles or irregular shapes. So there is perfect order in randomness. We are alive because of the random movement of molecules within our cells and bodies. When you take medicine, you owe it’s effect to the random movement of the medicine molecules within your tissues to reach the place where they are needed. Randomness is the basis of life. The entire direction of science nowadays is based on the uncertainty theory and quantum physics. And this uncertainty or randomness creates the entire order of the universe, from atoms to vast galaxies. And what perfect order this is…so perfect that you predict with 100% accuracy when the Moon will show up and when the sun will rise and when Mars will be closest to Earth.
So based on theory as well as concrete solid research since 1992 I defy any human on the planet to prove me wrong. I can indeed tell you with 80% accuracy where the jackpot and other winning numbers will be within one third of the total pool of possible combinations. And it applies to any lottery in the world ! You cannot argue with results. You cannot argue with success. You cannot argue when you see with your own eyes 80% of the time the jackpot and hundreds of thousands of other prizes staring you in the face in my small size pool of numbers.
As for the economy and careers and hard work, I totally agree with you. People have to work hard. But I have never seen a person quit their job and try to earn a living buying the lottery. People buy the lottery for only a dollar or two, hoping to win. It’s a pleasant dream. And you know something? There are millions of people winning all over the world every week. They don’t quit their jobs. They continue do play and keep their jobs, happier to have a few thousand extra dollars to support them. No one takes it seriously enough to make it a gambling profession. People know the odds are slim, but they do play anyway because SOMEONE does win! Why not then help them get 300% closer to winning? What is wrong with that? They are buying anyway, so they may as well get closer to the winning numbers.
And incidentally, I am giving my numbers free of charge. Anyone writing me will get numbers free of charge. So again, there is no scam. In fact, I have a big chartered accounting firm willing to issue a certificate that they have seen my numbers BEFORE the draw date and that indeed those numbers contain the huge number of prizes (including the jackpot) that I claim.
So, for the sake of the truth and science, I am here to declare that it is indeed possible to predict the outcome. To say it cannot be done is simply a denial of the laws of nature. Randomness is predictable simply because it is random. That is the beauty of the argument. It’s like tossing a coin. Do it a 1000 times and you can predict that you will get 450 times Heads and 550 Tails within 99% certainty. Try it!! And you know why you can predict that? Simply because it is a random process ! If it were not random, it will be impossible to predict, because it will have a hidden agenda behind it. it will be “rigged”.
One last point. I don’t have a formula. I don’t have a system. I don’t do wheeling. I use pure science and mathematical tools to arrive to my list of numbers. No hocus pocus. No magic. No future or Tarot or horoscope readings. No nonsense. I don’t sell software. I don’t sell books. It is a very complex process and it employs a huge variety of skills. It takes me five hours to do it for each draw. My list of numbers is not fixed…it changes every single time for each draw and it has to be done fore each draw and tailor made to fit it perfectly. But is sure is powerful. Because it gives incredible results of corning winning numbers, including the Jackpot !
I am grateful for the lottery corporations for being so honest and for keeping the process totally random. That is exactly why I can predict the outcome, and that is precisely what I am counting on !
I am both open minded and skeptical. May i have a copy of your winning combinations? I want to see the results for group of lottery players in Philippines. Thank you!
I believe in you! in Lottory your not only Winning jackpot also helping other people. its a charitable foundation also.
Please give me your formula for winning lotto!
God Bless and Gud luck!
Please send me at my email.
pcs781@yahoo.com
Good evening Dr. Jordan
You seem like a very interesting and intelligent man, I am extreemely curious about your theory and would be very greatfull if you would let me have a look at your formula.
Wish you the best of luck,
Derek Kinsela
Well Dr. Jordan, it’s a year since you posted your article, can i still get your numbers ? I was working on a similar system several years back , but i hit a bit of a wall, would appreciate yours, might provide some inspiration. Thanx:)
Dr. Jordan,
Please send me some numbers either for the future Powerball in the U.S.A. or Cash 5 drawing for North Carolina.
Thank you!
Dear Dr Jordan,
I am very interested in your numbers system and would appreciate it if at all possible if you could email me your system or point me in the direction where I can ascertain your system.
I have played lotto for nearly 20 years in Australia and I am always looking for new ways to increase my chances.
Your system sounds great but from what I understand you are talking about extremely large amounts of tickets to get your winning guarantee?
Anyway if you could send me anything I would appreciate your efforts.
Regards
Anthony
“Randomness is predictable simply because it is random.” Randomness is random, by definition. If the outcomes are limited, a distribution is predictable, but you aren’t playing a distribution of lotteries, you are playing one.
Put another way, if you get heads 20 times in a row, what is the probability you will get a tails on the next flip?
It is still 50%. Really. 1000 heads in a row does NOT increase your odds of getting tails on the next flip. Not one bit. Sorry, I know you think it seems like it should, but it doesn’t. Random. The human brain has a VERY difficult time accepting that randomness exists.
If you don’t understand this, however, then you can be ripped off.
Every single time the lottery is run, your odds of winning are random. raaaaa aaaaaaaaa aaa an dom. R a n n n dd d doo ooo mmm. mmmm.
Wow…sounds genuine….Reality is such a potent convincer
The reason you can increase your chances in the lottery is because with lotteries, the order of the numbers that you picked doesn’t matter- so it’s like rolling dice. Each of the numbers on each individual die has an equal chance of being rolled… but the probability that you’ll roll a 3 and 4 is greater than the probability that you’ll roll a 1 and 1. With two dice, you can roll a 3 & 4 in two ways (switch the numbers on the dice), but there’s only one way to roll a 1 & 1.
….And note… Next time you decide to try and insult someone’s intelligence, make sure you’re right, and don’t do it rudely. Otherwise you just sound like some kid on the nets who doesn’t know much of anything and make a living out of trolling, and we wouldn’t want that.
I am quite interested in your formula for the lottery…I am a big believer that anything is possible its been proven to me time & time again, so i would love to have a closer look at it. Thank You 🙂
Call me crazy but is it not as simple as taking all the possible number combinations and then simply use the process of elimination.
EXAMPLE:
6/54 system there is like 25 million combinations
Eliminate all in line numbers combinations like 1-2-3-4-5-6
Eliminate all odd combinations like 1-3-5-7-9-11
Eliminate all even combinations like 2-4-6-8-10-12
Then, eliminate all combinations that have been picked in the past
That would simply bring your odds of winning alot higher!!!
I believe you could take it further and eliminate combinations that are 5 in a row
Example:
1-2-3-4-5-22
Seriously what would that change your odds to???
What University did you attend?
Hi,
Dr. Jordan, I generally agree with your approach. Since the lottery is random, we can know a lot about it if we apply the right tools. By using statistics and working from an independent model that fits the game, the randomness can be used in favor of the prediction. The coin toss model you described is the perfect example – if you toss a coin 1000 times, it will land a certain percentage of times on heads and a certain percentage of times on tails to within some degree of certainty. If you toss it 2000 times, that certainty goes up even higher.
I have only just started testing predictive algorithms against the expected outcomes of the game, but have looked at many approaches. It can indeed be computationally intensive, but that’s what computers are for! I’d love to compare notes on approaches I’ve tried and the outcomes achieved.
I also agree that unless we can develop a much, much, much more sophisticated model with enough computing power to back it, we’ll never hit the lottery jackpot “every time” with a “single ticket.” That is ridiculous given the odds of game and the sophistication of the model it would entail. If such a model came into existence, the people running the lottery would have to inject additional “randomness” into the game.
But since the return from a winning ticket is so high, and I’m learning a lot and honing my analysis skills, it has been an exciting experience trying to predict an event with such staggering odds!
Very interesting…I’d love to know more about this method of yours.
I must admit, I am skeptical. Assuming that the lottery is truly random, I don’t see how any amount of science or mathematics could narrow down the list of possible winning numbers. Random is random. To use your example, you could flip a coin 1000 times and get 450 heads and 550 tails, but what does that say about your 1001st coin flip? The odds are still 1:2. If you were to somehow get heads every time, you could predict the 1001st flip will be tails since after enough trials, your results should show 1:2 odds. But the probability of that 1001st coin flip being tails is still 1:2. It behaves independently of past results, like any random occurrence.
I hope you can convince me I’m wrong as I’m dying for a mathematical challenge.
good day Dr. Jordan,
without to much ado, f u favor me…may i have a copy of your winning combinations?
pls feel free to email it here..
kairosdavao22@yahoo.com
Total Nonsense.
The dice analogy is a perfect example of your blatant lack of understanding.
7 comes up on two dice so often because there is a greater chance of 7 popping up.
Work out the combinations..! The odds of throwing a 7 are 5:1, the odds of a 2 or 12, 35:1.
You have an 80% success rate using 1/3.475 (about 29%)of numbers. To increase that to 100%, you would STILL need to put on all lines!! ALL LINES…! Your current odds are at best in line with guessing 400,000 combinations…!
If you have captured the jackpot every week for 10 years, THAT, would be clever, but you haven’t.. because you’re writing on internet forums, trying to find ‘investors’ for your SCAM.
Good day Dr. Jordan
I am both open minded and skeptical. May i have a copy of your winning combinations? I want to see the results for group of lottery players in Hong Kong. Thank you!
alan_3am@yahoo.com
sir,
I believe that lotto numbers can be mathematically determined. No doubt. The problem is many claim to be able to do that, only in order to part people from their money. I speak from experience: Believing it can be done and believing that people are honest I have twice bought programs that people claimed can work the lotto winning numbers out. Both times it was a sham!!!!
It can be done. I am not that good at maths to formulate the right formula but, there is no doubt that some mathematicians can and did to my certain knowledge. Problem is where does one find this formula?? Who can you trust to tell/sell you the real thing??
It is true that lottery numbers can be predicted but, so far so good i have only come across
one program which can actually predict lottery numbers and its not consistent but it works.
on fairly basis it predicts 2 to 3 numbers per draw.And one thing to note its very time consuming but its fun to work with.if any one is interested about the program here is the
name Visual recurrence analysis just google it out and this site explains how to use it
lotterypost.com and zarnia.250free.com
Dear Dr Jordan,
I’m very interesting about your topic. I have the same thoughs as you. My ideas is that the numbers are random, so they never cannot be 1, 2, 3, 4 or 2,4,6,8 and so on. By doing this way I can reject a lot of draws from my list to make it smaler.
student,
thang12000vn@yahoo.com
Over a period of 2 years I developed a number programs which analysed all prior results each week in the u.k. lotto and had 10 winnings in that period then I found I had a feedback loop which skewed the results. When I adjusted the program the
‘patterns’ disappeared , so my winnings were chance.
I know that you cannot predict lottery results but ‘feel’ that there are unlikely combinations like 1-2-3-4-5-6 or 44-45-46-47-48-49 . Am I wrong ???
Yes, John, according to my understanding, you are incorrect. The human mind is very bad at understanding probabilities. We don’t get “randomness” because our brains are designed to extract order from chaos. When there is no order, we invent our own. This is the brain basis of superstition. Just as we have a physical blind spot in each of our eyes that we ignore, we also have computational blind spots which result in our superstitious nature. This in turn makes us often overly optimistic and susceptible to scams. This explains many things about us as a species, including our over population, the depletion of the oceans as a food source, Las Vegas, and why we get so much spam telling us that we have won millions of dollars.
Numbers are spooky when you try to find a pattern from random picks in a lottery. I agree each pick is independant of any other. Here is fun way to see how your mind works to find order in random events. Make a list of all the lottery numbers and then asign a color, animal, plant or a basic element, whatever you like for each number. Then try to work with your new list to pick a winner. I bet you will miss the numbers as your mind rejects finding order in things that are not normally thought of in that way.
Dr Jordan says:
“What I can do is trap the jackpot in one third of all possible combinations. I also trap hundreds of thousands of secondary prizes, and not only the jackpot. For example, in the Canadian 6/49 lottery a week ago, I trapped the jackpot and 360,000 secondary prizes in 5 million out of the possible 14 Million combinations. This means that I have almost TRIPLED the chance of winning.”
I would like to see just what this means as far as winnings verses cost of tickets. How would you pick say 100 winners out of the 5 million? I can’t imagine anyone buying 5 million tickets. If you had 5 million people each give a dollar to one person to “pool the bets” how do you avoid corruption? Are you going to provide this service for free?
I would have said I trapped 364,248 secondary winners.
Just a thought – it’s all in fun right?
ARJAY
I agree that using a statistical and quantum approach especially with the knowledge of Brownian (random) motion, the lotto can be indirectly predicted. I said indirectly predicted because you can’t predict an exact drawing, only a set of drawings with a guarantee that the winning numbers falls within those sets of drawings. This is done purely by process of elimination (eliminating consecutive number combination, squared number combination, previous drawings, etc)due to the fact that you know the intrinsc behavior of the lottery. It’s do-able but difficult and time-consuming. I have yet to see anyone do it though. I guess I would have to see it to believe it. Send me a copy if you may.
smylez227@yahoo.com
hello Dr Jordan i would love to have a copy of your winning numbers thanks in advance helestephe@aol.com
HELLO DR JORDAN I NEVER RECEIVED THE COPY THAT I REQUESTED OF YOU IN 2009. MAY I STILL HAVE A COPY THANK YOU SO MUCH
Dr. J says, “I don’t have it anymore so you’ll need to work out the formula yourself. Just factor in the new data from Pluto as far as gravity influencing the probabilities of you winning and you’ll get it.” At least I think that’s what he said. He was sort of hard to hear from up in the hot air balloon when he flew over last night. – Xeno
Dr. Jordan,
I would appreciate a copy of your book.
avishek.nagi@gmail.com
Dr,Jordan
Could you please send me the numbers for australian lotto.
Thanks
Kumar
i have not received my copy yet
sir, I am making a program to try to run the variables, I would love to see your system and compare it. my email is stephenschubring@gmail.com
I’m a lsu student making it partly for class and partly to see if I can win. I would be using it on the Louisiana lottery if that helps at all. thank you for your time.
A game like “Numbers” (NY), with only 3 digits to guess, has much less possible combinations, why don’t you use your method on these ?
Dear Dr. Jordan. Please can I have a copy of your numbers for the UK lottery. I’m not a mathematician, I have no axe to grind and I’ll give any method a try. Thank you in anticipation of your reply
i will loved to know more about your method. I am hoping to surprise the lottery industry to help the poor children in Ghana.
Thanks
I have not yet received a copy of your method. Ghanaian national lottery operates on 5/90 numbers. I am very hopeful your method will do it all.
Thanks
i believe you and will loved to know more about your method. I am hoping to surprise the national lottery industry in Ghana to help the poor children in Ghana.
Thanks
And incidentally, I am giving my numbers free of charge. Anyone writing me will get numbers free of charge. So again, there is no scam.
A true scientist will not only give the numbers but the method to derive them also.
Give the method or else there is no point in all these, scientifically speaking. And i’m only interested in mathematics/science.
And last but not least what you say about randomness does not make any sense at all. In a random game of chance there is no fway to predict anything concrete to increase your probabilities of winning(when money is not an issue-this is important). Period.
Yet there are methods of decreasing the vigorish for you, for example by playing a good wheel system. Of course the probabilities for that system remain the same(contrary to the bull[crap] wheel generator authors will say)! But you just save more money and keeping the same efficiency(probability to win) by using the wheel systems.
Returning to my second paragraph when i said there is no way to predict anything concrete to a random game of chance, and what you said about that did not make any sense, so yet again this previous fact does not mean your method can’t work. Because the lottery system your method is applied to, may not be (truly) random and may have a deficiency and be non-random(semi random) and you then can actually predict what you say you can predict.
But if it was random then NO. You can’t predict anything from what you say.
Dear Jordan,
I am from singapore and its quite close to gettin the winnng number of 6 out of 45…your explaions makes sense to me although somethng is missing somewhere
Pease ontact me i can work out something wit you…at mutafa.rakhshan@gmail.com
take care and god Bless
Musafa
Sorry i think smething wrong with my keybord email is mustafa.rakhshan@gmail.com
thanks
Hello Dr. Jordan,
I find werry interesting what you have written, I my self have done some reshearch on lottery, because i want to prove that jackpot can be won with use of math..I started with my research 4 years ago, even tho i am not a passionate player, i had wery good results with 5 hits out of 7 , or in 6/45 game 4 out of 6 for 2 months in row, that means every time i put bet i get double in return, ofc, that is not enough for living but it is enough to play the game for free.. So i am wery interested in your research, and if you would be kind enough to show peace of it to me on e mail i would be greatfull, thank you in advance.
e-mail. Count13@hotmail.co.uk
Hi,
very interesting comments and theorum.
There is both truth in arguememt for predictability and simple chance/luck.
Randomness is a fairer gamble than a rigged game, and if you have the finance and ‘balls’ to play big combination lists, you will eventually have wins… but for every extra person who plays the same system or numbers… top prize pools are reduced. Meaning that you are less likely to get your return of outlay.
Saying that-
a sole individual could play a system which in effect will probably recoup losses from time to time… similar to a roulette player… it is reasonably fair ‘gamble’… except the ’00’ offsets the likely eventual return. So over an infinate period you would lose further and further. this is why the casinos and lottery organisers are not in recession! house always win eventually.
If you play 14 million combinations.. you would win but the jackpot and small prize wins needs to total your outlay… thats a huge risk, hoping that no one else will play the winning numbers and share the now reduced prize.
The best way to spend your time and money in my opinion, is to save and invest in yourself. Just as Xeno mentioned., think of a service or product that you could provide, which is in demand… get passionate about offering it- offer at a better rate, providing the best service, and be prepared to work … you will then win!
Dr jordan please! please!! please!!! can the formula also be used for 5/90 if yes can i borrow the formula
The lottery is random and no math formula can improve your odds. Really. That’s really the real answer. Pleading will not change that reality. The rest of this is just a “story”:
Okay, just kidding. I do know the secret formula but I will not use it or tell anyone for ethical reasons. The same reasons I will not tell everything I know about UFOs. Some information would only be abused if it went public.
If there was a secret formula, the people at the NSA would know about it because they tap, store and analyze all electronic communications. No one has a real formula except the people in cryptography who will not use it. It took a quantum computer to work out the motion of the balls starting from a snapshot of their initial position. There are only a few quantum computers in the world. They are all secret. The NSA has one, the Russians… I’ve already said too much. Anyway, I’ve wondered if it has leaked out because it seems these people found it too. No way they could have done it without the quantum computer. They had help.
To summarize, there really is no formula. Forget about it.
Yeah…… if you heard it on FOX News then it must be true. Uh-huh.
hello dr jordan,
i find what you have said very interesting, and im equally as curious’ you say you will give anyone who writes you your method, so please get in touch, loko181@hotmail.co.uk
thank you,
R Elliott, Just like a casino, “Dr. Jordan” is manipulating you based on your greed at wanting something for nothing and your inability to understand probabilities. There is no method. His claims are a scam. He is actually saying that if you buy millions of lottery tickets, his “method” you will give you a better chance than you should have of getting the jackpot. Great, isn’t it? All you have to do is come up with several million dollars to buy the tickets and then you can see if he was right or if you just lost several million dollars.
Try this, and this, and this, and…
Dr.Jordan please send me the numbers 4 the new jersey lottery 6/49 4 Monday January 31/2010 i love the lottery game please e-mail me back.
what a bozo ! no method can predict a single random event -we do not see sequential winning results because there are many many more random combinations. the only thing that can be said is ha including numbers above 31 slightly reduces the chance of having to share the prize. also he european lotteries are lump sum and tax free.
also my keyboard T is sticking !!
Dear Dr. Jordan,
Interested on the furmula you developed. Using mathmatics relating to probability has been around for a long time. Counting cards in “blackjack” uses a plus minus system that narrows the range of cards and increses your “probable chance” of hitting the right numbers. I am wondering if your system uses similar techniques for the lotto.
Dear Dr. Jordan,
I just googled and found this page of yours. I am very interested in your numbers for the New York State Lotto and for Mega Millions. Do I have to give you the drawing dates. New York Lotto is help on Wednesdays and Saturdays, and as you already know, Mega’s days are Tuesday and Fridays. Thanks
Hello m r. Jordan i would like to look at your formula of number Would you please email me at longtea3232@hotmail.com. Your method is very interesting , thanks
Is anyone listening to Xeno? He has told you all and explained it to you more than once. This “formula” sounds like one big scam if you ask me and to put it in the words of Xeno “…if you get heads 20 times in a row, what is the probability you will get a tails on the next flip?
It is still 50%. Really. 1000 heads in a row does NOT increase your odds of getting tails on the next flip. Not one bit. Sorry, I know you think it seems like it should, but it doesn‚Äôt.” Does that not clearly say that this formula is fake?
Thanks Chris. I do hope a few people reading this will get it, but some won’t because probability is so counter intuitive. People don’t believe in randomness because our brains are, in a sense, anti-randomness generators. Also, I think we are genetically programmed to ignore reality in cases where being overly optimistic gives us hope and comfort.
I would love to clear my mind of such order and structure. Please let me know of an acceptable way to convey this…Intellectual knowledge is invaluable
Could it be that “the lottery” isn’t a “chance” event? May the lottery not have a certain logic to it? The winners did find a method after several years using a formula and a computer, if I should believe the winners weren’t all lying and article is a complete falsehood. Perhaps “chance” is more an ideal circumstance than we like to think? After all, isn’t the “lottery” as it is conducted in the real world computerized or mechanized in some way? In fact, doesn’t chaos theory say randomness is patterned?
Whatever, I’m not really interested in this anyway! What nutty person wants to win a whole lot of money, except the unfortunates who think it’ll make’m happier. Silly people!
No, unless there is cheating, the motion of the balls, and thus the draw, is random. Our brains hallucinate order when confronted with chaos. Order (a normal distribution, for eg) does emerge in reality when you look at a whole system ( insurance and gambling industries make use of this) but you still can’t reliably predict anything about any given individual under the curve.
please can you help me win lotto 5/90 Ghana .IF YES then give me guidelines.thank you Francis Obeng
This is a interesting topic we all would like the opportunity to access such a system that enhance your chances of winning. So how is that formula able to work for the average person? Since you put a lot into getting the group of numbers daily.
We all would like to be given a large sum of free money, wouldn’t we?
I suggest you re-read the article.
All you have to do is put your finger in your left ear, hop on your right foot and say, “Xeno Xeno, what does he know?” before you purchase a lottery ticket. If you do this, you will have the same improvement in your odds as if you used the math formula.
HAHA!! Good one Xeno!
please can you help me win lotto 5/90 Ghana . IF YES then please kindly give me numbers to win, because I am in need.
thank you Ernest.
please below find some past results to figure out which number could be appear in the next draw. and the date is every Saturday.
Call me crazy but is it not as simple as taking all the possible number combinations and then simply use the process of elimination.
EXAMPLE:
6/54 system there is like 25 million combinations
Eliminate all in line numbers combinations like 1-2-3-4-5-6
Eliminate all odd combinations like 1-3-5-7-9-11
Eliminate all even combinations like 2-4-6-8-10-12
Then, eliminate all combinations that have been picked in the past
That would simply bring your odds of winning alot higher!!!
I believe you could take it further and eliminate combinations that are 5 in a row
Example:
1-2-3-4-5-22
Seriously what would that change your odds to???
You can’t eliminate any combinations. All are equally possible. Sequences and past winning combos are no more or less likely to happen. Random. It is random.
The lottery is not truly random. If it were, then you would see combinations comming up several times in a row. The way the numbers are drawn are psuedo-random. A facsimile of randomness. Not true randomness. True randomness is found in nature and the intricate workings of the sub atomic universe. Therefore, by the lottery drawings not being truly random, one can, over the course of time, see patterns and cycles of how the numbers really move. You have to understand randomness for what it is to grasp the concept of it. You can’t put odds on true randomness. Nature won’t let you.
hi mr.jordan, could you pls send me the method for euromillions (uk)which uses 6/49 and two lucky number method.
my email is gojaisey@hotmail.com
heyy dr jordan..
im from singapore.. i have been following the statistic given by the toto website. however each time i buy the number, the numbers that hit mostly was 3 or barely 4. i was hoping that myabe you can help me to tell how can i closed up the gap so that i can hit atleast 5 number or more by using your method/formula as u metioned above.. i do hope you could help me out with this.. pls dr john.. thanks..
regards,
sani
Randomness, what do we know about it?
Process of eliminations, very good.
Really you need to invest millions to win millions.
I’m curious to see what this formula like
pm andry-at-tokyo-dot-com
cheers mate
hello may I have the numbers to mega millions and power ball
Can you put fruit in a blender, blend it up, then reverse the direction of the blender blade rotation and have the fruit reconstructed good as new?
May you live in a different universe where there is no such thing as randomness, no such thing as entropy, where matter and anti matter are found in equal proportions, where you can choose to move forward or backward in time?