In today’s digital era, the erosion of online privacy has emerged as a pressing issue, with both individuals and entities facing heightened risks of data breaches, surveillance, and exploitation. This  report explores the key factors driving the decline of online privacy, impacts and strategies for improvement.

1. Factors Impacting Online Privacy

Laws, Protective

Some laws and regulations which have for the most part boosted consumer privacy on the internet include:

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA): Enacted in the United States on October 21, 1998, COPPA focuses on protecting the online privacy of children.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): Passed in 1999, the GLBA requires financial institutions to disclose how they share and protect customer data, allowing customers to opt out of data sharing.

These early regulations laid the groundwork for addressing privacy concerns in the digital age, setting the stage for further developments in online privacy legislation and practices. Several laws in the United States have since been implemented to address consumer privacy online. Some of these laws include:

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): This law requires businesses to disclose their data collection and sharing practices and allows consumers to opt out of the sale of their personal information.

Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA): Enacted in 2021, this law gives Virginians the right to access and delete their personal data held by businesses.

Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act: This law regulates the use of biometric information and requires consent before collecting such data.

Oregon Consumer Privacy Act (OCPA): This law includes provisions on biometric data, sensitive data, and children’s data protections.

Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act: Limits the collection of personal data to relevant information and allows residents to opt-out or decline the sale of their personal data.

Despite these state-level efforts, a comprehensive federal law regulating privacy in the U.S. is still lacking, leading to a patchwork of sectoral federal and state laws governing personal information. The effectiveness of some state privacy laws has been questioned due to lobbying by big tech companies and the absence of a federal privacy law.

Laws, Major Anti-Privacy (United States)

Some laws and regulations which have significantly or partly eroded consumer privacy on the Internet include:

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA): Allows for surveillance of communications between foreign powers and agents of foreign powers.

US Homeland Security Act: Provides for various measures related to homeland security, including surveillance and data collection.

Telecommunications Act of 1996: Contains provisions related to communications privacy and data protection.

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): While primarily focused on consumer rights, it can also impact privacy by regulating data collection and sharing practices.

Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act: Provides certain rights to consumers but may also have implications for privacy regulations.

These laws, while not explicitly designed to remove privacy, can have implications that favor government surveillance or corporate data collection practices, impacting individual privacy rights.

Court Cases, Pro Privacy

Major Pro-Online-Privacy Court Cases Since the Beginning of the Internet have had some positive impacts.

1. United States v. Warshak
Established a reasonable expectation of privacy for emails stored on third-party servers.

2. Elonis v. United States
Impact on what is considered threatening on social media platforms.

3. National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services
Case related to net neutrality and FCC’s authority to classify internet services.

4. Carpenter v. United States, Jun 2018
Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is needed to access a person’s cellphone location history.

5. Commonwealth v. Kurtz, Feb 2024
Challenged the use of “reverse searches” by police, addressing privacy concerns.

6. Netchoice, LLC v. Bonta, Feb 2024
Highlighted constitutional defects of a California law protecting consumer privacy.

7. Sarkar v. Doe – PubPeer Subpoena Challenge
Challenge to a subpoena issued to the website PubPeer, addressing internet privacy concerns.

These cases reflect significant legal battles that have shaped online privacy rights and regulations over the years.

Court Cases, Anti-Privacy

Major Court Cases Negatively Impacting Online Privacy also have occurred:

1. ACLU v. US Department of Justice (Jan 2020)
The ACLU petitioned to unseal a secret judicial ruling related to the First Amendment and common law, arguing for public access to legal rulings and docket sheets.

2. Twitter, Inc., v. Taamneh (Feb 2023)
This case questioned whether social media platforms could be held liable for “aiding and abetting” terrorists despite having policies against terrorist content.

3. Commonwealth v. Kurtz (Feb 2024)
– Involving “reverse searches,” this case ruled that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy for queries entered into search engines, impacting online privacy rights.

4. Carpenter v. United States (Jun 2018):
The Supreme Court ruled that a warrant is required for accessing a person’s cellphone location history, establishing stronger privacy protections for digital data.

5. Gonzalez v. Google and Taamneh v. Google:
These cases concern Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and could potentially alter how the Internet is regulated, impacting online platforms’ legal immunity for user-generated content.

These cases highlight ongoing legal battles surrounding online privacy rights.

Data Collection and Surveillance

Companies like Google (https://www.google.com/privacy) and Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/about/privacy) amass extensive personal data through online activities such as browsing habits, social media interactions, and geolocation tracking.

Surveillance initiatives by intelligence agencies like the NSA (https://www.nsa.gov/what-we-do/) and tech giants like Amazon (https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/data-privacy-faq/) exacerbate privacy concerns, fueling fears of mass surveillance and data exploitation.

Data Breaches and Cyberattacks

Cyberattacks targeting personal data, exemplified by the Equifax breach in 2017 (https://www.equifax.com/personal/) have exposed millions to identity theft, financial scams, and reputational harm.

Inadequate cybersecurity measures and lax data protection protocols render individuals vulnerable to breaches, jeopardizing their privacy rights.

There are concerns that data breaches might be created by state actors to cover illegal spying activities as these give plausible deniability as to sources of data leaks.

Lack of Regulation and Transparency

The absence of stringent privacy laws, especially at the Federal level, enables companies to exploit user data with impunity.

Insufficient transparency in data collection practices leaves individuals uninformed about the utilization and sharing of their personal information.

 

2. Implications for Individuals and Society

Loss of Autonomy

Individuals relinquish control over their personal data, impacting decision-making autonomy and self-expression.

Targeted advertising tactics employed by companies like Amazon (https://advertising.amazon.com/resources/ad-specs) influence consumer behavior without explicit consent.

Threats to Democracy

Online surveillance undermines democratic values by impeding freedom of speech and assembly.

Manipulative disinformation campaigns can distort political discourse and diminish trust in democratic institutions.

Psychological Impact

Pervasive surveillance fosters feelings of anxiety, stress, and paranoia among individuals.

Blurred privacy boundaries online engender vulnerability and erode trust in digital interactions.

 

3. Safeguarding Online Privacy

The protection of online privacy involves a complex interplay between individual rights, governmental regulations, and corporate practices. The U.S. lacks a comprehensive Internet privacy law. Efforts being made to enhance consumer protection may only end up protecting companies. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) oversees Internet privacy but lacks the authority to impose fines for most violations. The FCC also is supposed to play a role in protecting Americans’ data and privacy through investigations and enforcement actions. Regulatory capture may prevent this in practice, however. Stakeholders have suggested that an overarching Internet privacy law, clear regulations, and enhanced enforcement could improve consumer protection. Individual users can take a few steps to protect their online privacy, such as using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and browser extensions like Privacy Badger.

Strong Data Protection Laws

– Implementing robust data protection laws emphasizing user consent, data minimization, and transparency in data handling.
– Enforcing stringent penalties for privacy violations to deter misuse of personal information.

Privacy-enhancing Technologies

– Advocating for encryption tools like Signal (https://signal.org/en/) and decentralized platforms such as Brave Browser (https://brave.com/) that prioritize user privacy.
– Promoting VPNs (Virtual Private Networks) like NordVPN (https://nordvpn.com/) to safeguard sensitive information from unauthorized access.

Digital Literacy and Awareness

– Educating users on online privacy risks, secure data practices, and identifying threats like phishing scams.
– Empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their digital footprint by understanding the implications of sharing personal information online.

Decentralization

Decentralization can protect privacy by empowering individuals to control their data and reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches. Here’s how decentralization enhances privacy protection:

Decentralized Control
Decentralized apps (dApps) eliminate the need for centralized authorities, giving users greater control over their data.

Users can choose what information to share and with whom, maintaining ownership of their data and granting access on a need-to-know basis.

Immutable and Transparent Record
Decentralized apps enable an immutable and transparent record of data that can’t be altered or deleted, enhancing data security and reducing cybercrime rates. This sounds like the opposite of privacy, but users of dApps do not need to provide personal information to utilize the services offered by the app. While transactions are transparent on the blockchain, the data itself is encrypted, ensuring that all network participants can verify transactions without compromising privacy. This argument may sound like a bad joke to anyone who knows that devices are hardware compromised with backdoors.

Smart Contracts
Smart contracts in dApps enforce predefined rules, enabling secure and automatic data interactions without intermediaries, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.

Decentralized Identification
Web3 platforms use decentralized protocols to empower users to control their data, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity.

Blockchain-based identification allows secure, immutable, and distributed identity management, reducing vulnerability to cyber attacks and identity theft.

Ownership
Web3 gives users full ownership and control over their personal information, allowing them to decide how their data is used and who has access to it. This shift in ownership puts individuals back in charge of their privacy, ensuring complete autonomy over their personal information.

By leveraging decentralized solutions like blockchain technology and dApps, individuals can protect their privacy, reduce the risk of data breaches, and regain control over their personal information in an increasingly digital world.

Unfortunately, Big Tech companies can employ various strategies behind the scenes to act against decentralized applications (dApps) due to the potential disruption they pose to traditional industries. So far, the decentralized app user experience slow enough, awkward enough and frustrating enough than consumers have felt privacy providing options are not viable.

Conclusion

The erosion of online privacy presents profound challenges to individual rights, societal values, and democratic ideals in the digital age. By addressing root causes of privacy erosion, implementing effective regulatory frameworks, advocating for privacy-enhancing technologies, and enhancing digital literacy among users, we can strive towards a more secure and privacy-respecting online environment for all.the only real change to online privacy will happen when individual human rights are given higher priority than governmental and corporate rights. In reality, however, since people have given their authority to governments and corporations, the trend toward less privacy for individuals is unlikely to change.

 

Citations

^{[1] https://epic.org/issues/privacy-laws/united-states/
[2] https://forkast.news/why-decentralization-protect-user-data-privacy/
[3] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7163223
[4] https://ironcladapp.com/journal/contracts/from-net-neutrality-to-clickwrap-10-major-internet-law-cases-since-2000/
[5] https://lasr.cs.ucla.edu/vahab/resources/privacy_concerns.pdf
[6] https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/how-your-personal-information-is-protected-online
[7] https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/privacy/consumer-data-privacy-laws/
[8] https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/insights/privacy/state-privacy-legislation-tracker/
[9] https://safecomputing.umich.edu/privacy/history-of-privacy-timeline
[10] https://statescoop.com/state-privacy-laws-fail-protect-consumer-data-2024/
[11] https://www.aclu.org/court-cases?issue=internet-privacy
[12] https://www.aclu.org/court-cases?issue=privacy-technology
[13] https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/20/tech/supreme-court-tech-platforms/index.html
[14] https://www.csoonline.com/article/567531/the-biggest-data-breach-fines-penalties-and-settlements-so-far.html
[15] https://www.datasciencecentral.com/how-decentralized-apps-can-help-businesses-improve-data-security-and-privacy/
[16] https://www.doubloin.com/learn/how-web3-protect-privacy
[17] https://www.fcc.gov/privacy-and-data-protection-task-force
[18] https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/12/10/how-decentralized-identity-is-reshaping-privacy-for-digital-identities/
[19] https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2023/04/21/us-data-privacy-protection-laws-a-comprehensive-guide/
[20] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/speeches/privacy-internet-evolving-legal-landscape
[21] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/speeches/protecting-consumers-privacy-goals-accomplishments
[22] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/topics/protecting-consumer-privacy-security
[23] https://www.gao.gov/blog/2019/02/19/your-internet-privacy
[24] https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-19-52
[25] https://www.govtech.com/public-safety/supreme-court-ruling-adds-privacy-protection-for-the-digital-age.html
[26] https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/two-supreme-court-cases-that-could-break-the-internet
[27] https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/state-of-privacy-laws-in-us/
[28] https://www.popsci.com/how-to-protect-online-privacy-vpn/
[29] https://www.privacyworld.blog/summary-of-data-privacy-protection-laws-in-the-united-states/
[30] https://www.skyflow.com/post/a-brief-history-of-data-privacy-and-what-lies-ahead
[31] https://www.varonis.com/blog/us-privacy-laws}