What if I have tissue damage from “safe” limits set by 5G regulatory bodies?
If you have tissue damage from “safe” limits set by 5G regulatory bodies, it would likely raise concerns about the adequacy of those limits and the overall safety of the technology.
In such a scenario, it is important to seek medical attention to address the tissue damage and understand its specific cause. Additionally, you may want to report the incident to the appropriate regulatory authorities or public health agencies in your region. This will help them investigate and potentially reassess the safety guidelines in place.
The regulatory bodies responsible for setting the limits for 5G emissions usually base their guidelines on extensive research and scientific studies. However, these guidelines are subject to ongoing review as new research emerges. If other individuals have experienced similar issues, it could contribute to the growing body of evidence and prompt the regulatory bodies to reevaluate and potentially revise the established limits.
It’s worth noting that, officially, the overwhelming majority of research indicates that 5G technology is safe and that the levels of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields emitted by 5G networks are well below the established limits. However, if you personally experience tissue damage within these limits, it is crucial to take it seriously and ensure appropriate investigation and action are taken.
Are Doctors Familiar with Tissue Damage Caused by Chronic EMF Overexposure?
There is currently limited scientific evidence to support the notion that chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) causes tissue damage. While some studies have suggested potential health concerns associated with EMF exposure, most of them have been inconclusive or contradictory. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that there is no clear evidence of adverse health effects caused by exposure to EMF within the guidelines recommended by international bodies.
Given the current scientific understanding, it is unlikely that doctors would be familiar with tissue damage specifically caused by chronic EMF overexposure. However, as medical professionals, doctors are trained to recognize and treat a wide range of health conditions and would be able to recommend appropriate interventions for symptoms or conditions reported by patients.
It is worth noting that doctors prioritize evidence-based medicine, which relies on the best available scientific evidence and peer-reviewed research. As more research is conducted and our understanding of EMF exposure improves, doctors will likely adapt their knowledge and recommendations accordingly.
